Monthly income

Is the 4% rule safe in India?

The 4% rule comes from US research. With India's higher inflation, is 4% a safe withdrawal rate here? We test 3%, 3.5%, 4% and 5%, and explain sequence risk.

If you’ve read anything about retirement, you’ve probably heard of the 4% rule: take out 4% of your savings in the first year, raise it with inflation every year after, and your money should last 30 years.

It’s a useful idea. But it was built on American data, and India is not America. Let’s look at where the rule comes from, how it holds up with Indian inflation, and what rate makes more sense here.

Where the 4% rule comes from

In 1994, a US financial planner named William Bengen looked at historical US stock and bond returns going back to the 1920s. He asked a simple question: what’s the highest amount a retiree could withdraw each year, rising with inflation, without running out of money in 30 years, even in the worst periods?

His answer was about 4% of the starting savings, for a portfolio split roughly half in shares and half in bonds. A later study from Trinity University in the US reached similar conclusions, and “the 4% rule” became famous.

How the 4% rule works, on ₹1 crore
Year 1Take out 4%: ₹4 lakh, or ₹33,333 a month
→
Year 2Raise it by inflation. At 6%: ₹4.24 lakh
→
Every year afterKeep raising with inflation, whatever markets do
The rate only sets the first year's withdrawal. After that, the amount follows inflation, not your portfolio.

Why India is different

1. Inflation has been higher. US inflation has averaged around 3% over the long run. India has generally been higher, and 6% is a common planning figure. Since your withdrawals rise with inflation, they grow much faster here. Higher returns in India have helped balance this, but not always.

2. The data is American. The rule is based on one country’s history, during a century that was very good for US markets. It’s not a law of nature.

3. Retirements can be longer. If you stop working at 50 or 55, or simply live into your 90s, your savings need to last well over 30 years.

Testing it with Indian numbers

Let’s take ₹1 crore, raise withdrawals by 6% every year, and see how long the money lasts at different starting rates and returns:

Starting rate Monthly income to start At 8% a year At 9% a year At 10% a year
3% ₹25,000 56 years 60+ years 60+ years
3.5% ₹29,167 43 years 60+ years 60+ years
4% ₹33,333 36 years 46 years 60+ years
5% ₹41,667 27 years 31 years 40 years
How long ₹1 crore lasts at an assumed 8% a year (withdrawals rise 6% a year)
3% a year56 years
3.5% a year43 years
4% a year36 years
5% a year27 years
Fixed returns every year, which real markets never deliver. Real outcomes depend heavily on the order of good and bad years. Taxes not included.

At first glance, 4% looks fine: 36 years at 8%. But this test assumes the same return every single year. Real markets don’t work like that, and that’s where the real risk lies.

The hidden risk: the order of good and bad years

Imagine two retirees, each with ₹1 crore, each withdrawing ₹4 lakh in the first year and raising it 6% a year. Over 10 years, they get exactly the same returns, just in reverse order:

  • Retiree A has good years first: +25%, +18%, +12%… and the bad years (−12%, −20%) come later.
  • Retiree B has the bad years first.

Same returns, same average, same withdrawals. Here’s what happens:

Same returns, different order: savings over 10 years
₹0L₹45L₹90L₹135L₹180LYr 0Yr 2Yr 4Yr 6Yr 8Yr 10Retiree ARetiree B
Both retirees start with ₹1 crore and withdraw ₹4 lakh in year 1, rising 6% a year. Retiree A's returns: 25, 18, 12, 10, 8, 6, −5, −12, −20, 15%. Retiree B gets the same returns in reverse. Illustration only.

After 10 years, Retiree A has about ₹1.07 crore. Retiree B has about ₹71 lakh, a third less, from the same returns.

This is called sequence of returns risk. When markets fall early, you’re selling units at low prices to fund your income, and those units aren’t there to benefit when markets recover. The first five to ten years of withdrawals matter most.

So what rate makes sense in India?

There’s no perfectly safe number, but a few principles help:

  • Start around 3 to 3.5% if your income needs to last 30 years or more. That’s where many practitioners in India land, and it’s where Bridgit Second Income starts.
  • Go lower if you retire early. The longer the horizon, the lower the rate.
  • You can go a little higher if you have other income, like a pension or rent, or a shorter horizon.

Make your plan more robust

  1. Keep 2 to 3 years of income in steadier funds. That way you don’t have to sell equity right after a fall, which takes much of the sting out of sequence risk.
  2. Be flexible. Skipping the inflation increase after a bad year, or trimming income slightly for a while, makes a big difference over decades.
  3. Review every year. If markets have done well, you may be able to raise your income. If not, adjust early rather than late.

The bottom line

The 4% rule is a good starting point for thinking, not a promise. In India, with higher inflation and potentially longer retirements, starting a little lower, around 3 to 3.5%, and staying flexible gives your savings a much better chance of lasting as long as you do.

Try different withdrawal rates in our SWP calculator, or see how much you need for ₹50,000 a month.

Questions people ask

What is the 4% rule?
It's a guideline from US research in the 1990s. Take out 4% of your savings in the first year of retirement, then raise that amount each year with inflation. In US historical data, this lasted at least 30 years in almost every period tested.
Does the 4% rule work in India?
It's riskier here. India has generally seen higher inflation than the US, so withdrawals have to rise faster, and the data the rule is based on comes from US markets. Many practitioners suggest starting lower in India, around 3 to 3.5%.
What is sequence of returns risk?
It's the risk that bad market years come early in your retirement, while you're withdrawing. Selling units after a fall uses up more of your savings, leaving less to recover when markets bounce back. Two retirees with the same average return can end up in very different places.
What withdrawal rate does Bridgit use?
Bridgit Second Income starts at about 3.5% a year, and your expert reviews the rate with you every year.
Should my withdrawal rate depend on my age?
Yes. The longer your savings need to last, the lower the rate should be. Someone retiring at 45 needs savings to last far longer than someone retiring at 65.
Written byNaina AroraBridgit Expert · NISM-certified

Naina Arora is a Bridgit Expert and NISM-certified mutual fund professional. Naina works with families and salaried professionals on goal-based portfolios, and writes about SIPs, SWPs and making savings last.

This article is for general information and education only, and is not investment, tax or legal advice. Figures are illustrations at fixed assumed rates; actual returns vary and can be negative. Tax rules are as we understand them at the time of writing and can change. Bridgit Finmart Pvt Ltd is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN 321635). Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully.

QR code: scan to chat with Bridgit on WhatsAppScan to chat
Start with a conversation

Let's build your portfolio.

+91 92899 80930 · Call or WhatsApp · www.bridgit.club

Chat with an expert